Volume 22, Issue 1 (7-2025)
ASWTR 2025, 22(1): 44-52 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sadeghnia M, Rezaei S. Comparison of the effects of laser and dry needling on pain, pain pressure threshold, and range of motion in muscles with trigger points: A Systematic Review.. ASWTR 2025; 22 (1) :44-52
URL: http://icml.ir/article-1-668-en.html
URL: http://icml.ir/article-1-668-en.html
Abstract: (1362 Views)
Background: Laser therapy (LT) and dry needling (DN) are two common methods for treating trigger points(TPs). Given the side effects of DN and the need for alternative methods, the aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence comparing LT and DN to aid clinical decision-making for therapists.
Methods: Databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct were searched from inception until December 15, 2024, along with Google Scholar to find gray literature. All randomized clinical trials comparing LT and DN in terms of pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and joint range of motion (ROM) in individuals with TPs were included.
Results:Ten studies met the criteria. All studies demonstrated improvements in the VAS, PPT, and ROM following both treatment methods. In group comparisons, most studies did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups. One study indicated that dry needling had a more significant effect on the VAS, PPT, and joint ROM, while another study showed that dry needling significantly increased the PPT in patients compared to laser therapy. Poor to high quality studies, indicated that there is no significant difference between the effects of LT and DN on pain severity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in patients with TPs in the neck region, as well as on PPT and ROM in patients with upper trapezious active TPs. Evidence level C suggests that there likely is no significant difference in the effects of LT and DN on pain and ROM in patients with active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle.
Conclusion: Evidence level C indicates that there likely is no significant difference between the effects of LT and DN on VAS and ROM in patients with TPs in the trapezius muscle.
Practical Implications: Given the nature of evidence level C, future clinical trials to replace dry needling with laser therapy should address the existing limitations.
Methods: Databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct were searched from inception until December 15, 2024, along with Google Scholar to find gray literature. All randomized clinical trials comparing LT and DN in terms of pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and joint range of motion (ROM) in individuals with TPs were included.
Results:Ten studies met the criteria. All studies demonstrated improvements in the VAS, PPT, and ROM following both treatment methods. In group comparisons, most studies did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups. One study indicated that dry needling had a more significant effect on the VAS, PPT, and joint ROM, while another study showed that dry needling significantly increased the PPT in patients compared to laser therapy. Poor to high quality studies, indicated that there is no significant difference between the effects of LT and DN on pain severity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in patients with TPs in the neck region, as well as on PPT and ROM in patients with upper trapezious active TPs. Evidence level C suggests that there likely is no significant difference in the effects of LT and DN on pain and ROM in patients with active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle.
Conclusion: Evidence level C indicates that there likely is no significant difference between the effects of LT and DN on VAS and ROM in patients with TPs in the trapezius muscle.
Practical Implications: Given the nature of evidence level C, future clinical trials to replace dry needling with laser therapy should address the existing limitations.
Educational: Review |
Subject:
General
Received: 2025/04/22 | Accepted: 2025/06/17 | Published: 2025/06/22
Received: 2025/04/22 | Accepted: 2025/06/17 | Published: 2025/06/22
References
1. Simons DG. Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. 2004;14(1):95-107. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.018] [PMID]
2. Urits I, Charipova K, Gress K, Schaaf AL, Gupta S, Kiernan HC, et al. Treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2020;34(3):427-48. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.003] [PMID]
3. Annemarie G, Ivan U, An D, Diep N, Matthew B, Cyrus Y, et al. A Comprehensive Review of the Treatment and Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2020;24(8). [DOI:10.1007/s11916-020-00877-5] [PMID]
4. Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points: pathophysiology and evidence-informed diagnosis and management: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2010.
5. McPartland JM, Simons DG. Myofascial trigger points: translating molecular theory into manual therapy. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2006;14(4):232-9. [DOI:10.1179/106698106790819982]
6. Fleckenstein J, Zaps D, Rüger LJ, Lehmeyer L, Freiberg F, Lang PM, et al. Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2010;11:1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-11-32] [PMID] []
7. Li X, Wang R, Xing X, Shi X, Tian J, Zhang J, et al. Acupuncture for myofascial pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):E883.
8. Müggenborg F, de Castro Carletti EM, Dennett L, de Oliveira-Souza AIS, Mohamad N, Licht G, et al. Effectiveness of Manual Trigger Point Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Trigger Points in the Orofacial Region-A Systematic Review. Life. 2023;13(2):336. [DOI:10.3390/life13020336] [PMID] []
9. Sadeghnia M, Shadmehr A, Mir SM, Rasanani M-RH, Jalaei S, Fereydounnia S. The immediate effects of deep transverse friction massage, high-power pain threshold ultrasound and whole body vibration on active myofascial trigger points. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2023. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.07.007] [PMID]
10. Rezaei S, Shadmehr A, Tajali SB, Moghadam BA, Jalaei S. Application of combined laser and compression therapy on the pain and level of disability on trigger points in upper trapezius muscle. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2020;14(2):97-104. [DOI:10.18502/jmr.v14i2.7707]
11. Michelle H, Cameron M. Physical agents in rehabilitation: an evidence-based approach to practice. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2017.
12. Forogh B, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Jebeli Fard R, Mirghaderi P, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Nakhostin-Ansari N, et al. Efficacy of trigger point dry needling on pain and function of the hip joint: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2024;42(2):63-75. [DOI:10.1177/09645284231207870] [PMID]
13. de la Barra Ortiz HA, Arias Avila M, Opazo Cancino J, Eloin Liebano R. Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy added to a physical therapy program for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Rehabilitation/Postępy Rehabilitacji. 2022;36(3). [DOI:10.5114/areh.2022.119498]
14. de la Barra Ortiz HA, Cangas SA, Herrera AC, García FO, Velásquez SV. Efficacy of class IV laser in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Physiotherapy Quarterly. 2021;29(2):1-11. [DOI:10.5114/pq.2021.105882]
15. Dach F, Ferreira KS. Treating myofascial pain with dry needling: a systematic review for the best evidence-based practices in low back pain. Arquivos de Neuro-psiquiatria. 2023;81(12):1169-78. [DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1777731] [PMID] []
16. Ahmad MA, Hamid MSA, Yusof A. Effects of low-level and high-intensity laser therapy as adjunctive to rehabilitation exercise on pain, stiffness and function in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2022;114:85-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.011] [PMID]
17. Gattie E, Cleland JA, Snodgrass S. The effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions by physical therapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2017;47(3):133-49. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2017.7096] [PMID]
18. Alsarhan J, El Feghali R, Alkhudari T, Benedicenti S. Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Management of Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Laser Photobiomodulation or Dry Needling? Meta-Analyses of Human Clinical Trials. Photonics. 2024;11(10). [DOI:10.3390/photonics11100965]
19. Machado E, Machado P, Wandscher V, Marchionatti A, Zanatta F, Kaizer O. A systematic review of different substance injection and dry needling for treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2018;47(11):1420-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.003] [PMID]
20. Vier C, de Almeida MB, Neves ML, Dos Santos ARS, Bracht MA. The effectiveness of dry needling for patients with orofacial pain associated with temporomandibular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian journal of physical therapy. 2019;23(1):3-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.008] [PMID] []
21. Uemoto L, Nascimento de Azevedo R, Almeida Alfaya T, Nunes Jardim Reis R, Depes de Gouvêa CV, Cavalcanti Garcia MA. Myofascial trigger point therapy: laser therapy and dry needling. Current pain and headache reports. 2013;17:1-6. [DOI:10.1007/s11916-013-0357-4] [PMID]
22. Ahi ED, Sirzai H. Comparison of the effectiveness of dry needling and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled study. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022;38(1):3. [DOI:10.1007/s10103-022-03687-w] [PMID]
23. Halle JS, Halle RJ. Pertinent dry needling considerations for minimizing adverse effects-part two. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2016;11(5):810.
24. Trybulski R, Kużdżał A, Kiljański M, Gałęziok K, Matuszczyk F, Kawczyński A, et al. Adverse Reactions to Dry Needling Therapy: Insights from Polish Physiotherapy Practice. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(23):7032. [DOI:10.3390/jcm13237032] [PMID] []
25. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine. 2009;151(4):W-65-W-94. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136] [PMID]
26. Herbert R, Moseley A, Sherrington C. PEDro: a database of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Health Information Management. 1998;28(4):186-8. [DOI:10.1177/183335839902800410] [PMID]
27. Parandnia A, Yassin M, Sarrafzadeh J, Salehi R, Navaei F. Comparison of the effects of dry needling and high-intensity laser therapy on pain intensity and pain pressure threshold in females with active trigger points in upper trapezius muscle: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Function and Disability Journal. 2020;3(1):111-22. [DOI:10.32598/fdj.3.16]
28. Agung I, Murdana N, Purba H, Fuady A, editors. Low-level laser therapy and dry needling for myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius muscle: An interventional study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 2018. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062045]
29. Seifolahi A, Rezaeian T, Mosallanezhad Z, Naimi SS. Comparison of the Effects of Dry Needling and Low-Level Laser on the Latent Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ),[online]. 2021;23(2):0-.
30. Van Heerden M. A Comparative Study between Low Level Laser Therapy and Myofascial Dry Needling on Active Gluteus Medius Trigger Points: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2014.
31. Lokesh V, Pundarikaksha P, Apparao P. Comparison of Dry Needling Versus Laser Therapy on Myofascial Trigger Points of Infraspinatus in Subjects with Shoulder Pain. Applied sciences. 2024;42(1):07-13.
32. Abd El Monem AM, Samaan SSR, Abd G, Monem E. Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy versus Dry Needling on Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Supraspinatus Tendinitis: Randomized Controlled Trial. physical therapy.80:7.
33. Ansari M, Baradaran Mahdavi S, Vahdatpour B, Lahijanian A, Khosrawi S. Effects of Dry Needling and Low-Power Laser for the Treatment of Trigger Points in the Upper Trapezius Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2022;21(4):288-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.013] [PMID] []
34. Oliveira DA, Pinto RdAS, Reis LdO, Dias IM, Leite ICG, Leite FPP. Clinical effectiveness evaluation of laser therapy and dry needling in treatment of patients with myofascial pain in masseter muscle. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy. 2018;44(1):22-41. [DOI:10.52010/ijom.2018.44.1.2]
35. Yassin M, Parandnia A, Sarrafzadeh J, Salehi R, Navaee F. The effects of high intensity laser therapy and dry needling on clinical signs in females with upper trapezius muscle active trigger points: A single blinded randomized clinical trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2024;40:1381-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.031] [PMID]
36. Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Current pain and headache reports. 2013;17:1-8. [DOI:10.1007/s11916-013-0348-5] [PMID]
37. Hakgüder A, Birtane M, Gürcan S, Kokino S, Nesrin Turan F. Efficacy of low level laser therapy in myofascial pain syndrome: an algometric and thermographic evaluation. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. 2003;33(5):339-43. [DOI:10.1002/lsm.10241] [PMID]
38. Agung I, Murdana N, Purba H, Fuady A, editors. Low-level laser therapy and dry needling for myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius muscle: An interventional study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 2018: IOP Publishing. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062045]
39. de la Barra Ortiz HA, Arias M, Liebano RE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of neck pain. Lasers in Medical Science. 2024;39(1):124. [DOI:10.1007/s10103-024-04069-0] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |